Bathurst Resources Limited
BRL.AX · New Zealand · 5 operating models
US$0.3585 × 241.9m diluted shares
Coverage average 4.4%
Risked NAV · US$552m
Asset P / NAV 0.07× Enterprise value ÷ attributable project NPV. Excludes corporate G&A, cash, debt and financing, so it compares across peers.
Includes US$29m deduction for non-debt claims.
Unrisked 0.14×
Risked NAV / diluted share
Unrisked US$2.58 / share
Enterprise value US$33m
Accounting EBITDA US$45m
30 Mt attributable saleable reserves
Investment case
Valuation gap
The market is pricing the company at 0.16× risked NAV, with +536.2% to the modeled per-share value.
Portfolio concentration
Tenas is the largest modeled value driver at 54.1% of positive project NAV.
Risk cost
Jurisdiction, permitting and project risk reduce unrisked value by US$73m before the equity bridge.
Price versus modeled value
Production and sustaining FCF
Sustaining free cash flow after tax and production, both at the company's ownership share.
2 Mt peak attributable production
27.5% 2026E FCF yield
US$82m net cash entering the model
Cash flow statement
Attributable to Bathurst Resources Limited shareholders. Each mine is modeled at 100%, including royalties and taxes, then included at the company's ownership share, so minority and government interests are already excluded.
| USD millions, except percentages and per-unit data | FY26 | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | 2030 | 2031 | 2032 | 2033 | 2034 | 2035 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 | |
| US$148m | US$148m | US$122m | US$197m | US$330m | US$330m | US$330m | US$330m | US$330m | US$330m | |
| US$93m | US$93m | US$79m | US$132m | US$189m | US$189m | US$189m | US$189m | US$189m | US$189m | |
| — | — | US$4m | US$10m | US$14m | US$14m | US$14m | US$14m | US$14m | US$14m | |
AISC (US$/t) | 91.3 | 91.4 | 140.9 | 168.1 | 130.4 | 130.3 | 130.3 | 130.3 | 130.2 | 130.2 |
G&A | US$10m | US$10m | US$10m | US$10m | US$10m | US$10m | US$10m | US$10m | US$10m | US$10m |
| US$45m | US$45m | US$29m | US$45m | US$117m | US$117m | US$117m | US$117m | US$117m | US$117m | |
Depreciation & depletion | US$3m | US$8m | US$6m | US$6m | US$13m | US$14m | US$15m | US$16m | US$17m | US$18m |
| US$42m | US$37m | US$23m | US$38m | US$104m | US$103m | US$102m | US$102m | US$101m | US$100m | |
Interest expense | US$0m | US$0m | US$0m | US$0m | US$0m | US$0m | US$0m | US$0m | US$0m | US$0m |
| US$42m | US$37m | US$23m | US$38m | US$104m | US$103m | US$102m | US$102m | US$101m | US$100m | |
| US$15m | US$13m | US$9m | US$14m | US$32m | US$32m | US$35m | US$37m | US$37m | US$36m | |
| US$28m | US$24m | US$14m | US$25m | US$72m | US$71m | US$67m | US$64m | US$64m | US$63m | |
| US$6m | US$6m | US$4m | US$6m | US$9m | US$9m | US$9m | US$9m | US$9m | US$9m | |
| US$0m | US$68m | US$69m | US$69m | US$0m | US$0m | US$0m | US$0m | US$0m | US$0m | |
| US$24m | US$25m | US$17m | US$26m | US$84m | US$82m | US$77m | US$74m | US$73m | US$73m | |
| 27.5% | 28.5% | 20% | 29.8% | 96.3% | 94.1% | 88.9% | 85.1% | 84.4% | 84% | |
| US$10m | US$23m | US$15m | US$20m | US$61m | US$55m | US$48m | US$42m | US$39m | US$35m | |
Cash | US$92m | US$49m | −US$3m | −US$47m | US$37m | US$118m | US$195m | US$269m | US$342m | US$415m |
EV | −US$5m | US$38m | US$90m | US$134m | US$50m | −US$32m | −US$109m | −US$182m | −US$256m | −US$329m |
Spending details
All-in cost per metre needs a disclosed cost or matching spend and metres for the same program and period.
NAV by asset
Mines, 2026 attributable
Metric tonnes; US$/t. Cash cost includes rail and port where reported FOB.
| Mine | Product | Own | Saleable Mt | Cash cost | Royalty | Sustaining | Margin | Reserves Mt | Life to | NPV US$m |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tenas Project | Mid-volatile semi-soft coking coal, 9.5% ash | 100% | — | — | — | — | — | 16.6 | 2051 | 270 |
| Buller (Escarpment Extension and Deep Creek) | Whareatea hard and semi-hard coking coal (WHCC, WSHCC) and Deep Creek PHCC | 100% | — | — | — | — | — | 9.9 | 2041 | 148 |
| Stockton Mine | Semi-hard and semi-soft coking coal blends (Alpine, PHCC, Granity, SSCC), low ash, high sulphur | 65% | 0.7 | $98 | $0 | $6 | $57 | 2.5 | 2028 | 46 |
| Mt Frederick South (BT Mining) | Upper Waimangaroa coking coal blended into Stockton products (low ash, 1.8% sulphur) | 65% | — | — | — | — | — | 1.9 | 2037 | 24 |
| North Island Domestic (Rotowaro and Maramarua) | Sub-bituminous thermal coal (about 22-24 MJ/kg) for Huntly power station and NZ Steel Glenbrook | 65% | 0.4 | $66 | $0 | $6 | $25 | 1.3 | 2027 | 10 |
| Total | 1.1 | $86 | $6 | $45 | 498 |
Benchmark to realised price, 2026
Spot case · US$ per metric tonne.
| Mine | Benchmark | Index | Realised | Realised % | Quality / basis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stockton Mine | PLV HCC | $271 | $160 | 59% | 4.5% ash · 3.30% S · 34.6% VM · FY26 realisation relative to PLV, less the FY27 product-mix headwind |
| North Island Domestic (Rotowaro and Maramarua) | — | — | $97 | — | 6.2% ash · 0.30% S · 37.3% VM · FY26 contract realisation (NZ$) |
| Company | $271 | $136 | 59% |
Production
Attributable production by mine
AISC by mine
Life-of-mine average · excludes corporate G&A
5 covered assets
Attributable economics on the spot case.